BloFin vs Bybit copy trading: head-to-head comparison

Anyone deciding between BloFin and Bybit for copy trading wants the same thing: which one lets me mirror a trader more precisely, vet that trader’s record more thoroughly, and keep more of the profit.

Most comparison pages that rank for this question answer with a generic score or a feature checklist that leaves the copy-trading row blank.

This one settles it with the specifics that actually matter, taken from each exchange’s official help center and verified in June 2026.

The short answer up front. The two platforms now tie on the entry point: both require 100 USDT to copy a trader.

BloFin pulls ahead on flexibility and vetting: it offers three copy modes instead of two, surfaces risk-adjusted trader metrics (Sharpe, Sortino, Calmar) that Bybit’s leaderboard leaves out, runs native spot copy alongside futures, and has an accessible VIP fee path.

Bybit pulls ahead on scale and precision: a slightly cheaper base futures fee, a longer track record, a larger roster with deeper liquidity, and more granular per-order risk parameters.

Neither platform is the right answer for everyone, so the rest of this guide shows where each one wins.

How we compared the two

A copier decides on six things: the minimum capital to copy one trader, the copy modes and position-sizing controls, the per-order risk settings, the depth of the trader analytics used to pick a lead, the profit share paid to that lead, and the cost and depth of the venue underneath.

Minimums, modes, and fee figures here come from each platform’s own help center and fee schedule, not from third-party aggregators.

Where one platform clearly wins a category, it is named. Where it does not, it is not.

Head-to-head comparison

All figures verified against support.blofin.com and the Bybit help center in June 2026.

Minimum to copy a trader

This one is a tie. The minimum funds to copy a single trader is 100 USDT on both platforms.

Bybit’s help center states that the floor to copy a Master Trader is generally 100 USDT, and an individual Master Trader can set a higher required minimum. BloFin’s effective minimum to copy a trader is also 100 USDT.

Because the entry point is the same, capital is not the deciding factor between these two.

A copier with 100 USDT can open on either platform, and a copier who wants to spread a small balance across several traders faces the same per-trader floor on both.

The split between BloFin and Bybit shows up in the controls, the trader analytics, and the venue underneath, not in how much you need to start. The sections below cover those.

Copy modes and position sizing

Both platforms let you decide how your funds track the lead. They differ in how many ways they let you do it.

BloFin offers three modes:

• Smart Copy. Leverage, margin mode, and trade sizing sync automatically with the lead. It is the one-click, set-and-forget option, recommended for beginners.
• Fixed Amount. Each copied trade uses the same set USDT margin, regardless of the lead’s order size. This keeps per-trade exposure predictable when a lead uses large or inconsistent position sizes.
• Fixed Ratio. Each copy scales by a multiplier of the lead’s order, so position size grows or shrinks with how much the lead invests. Margin per order equals the multiplier times the lead’s order value divided by your leverage.

Bybit offers two modes:

• Smart Copy Mode. Bybit sizes each copy by a fixed ratio calculated from the Master Trader’s order cost and available balance, and your leverage follows the Master Trader. This is the recommended mode for beginners.
• Advanced Copy Mode. You set a fixed margin for each copied order and choose your own leverage (follow the trader, fixed, or custom per contract). This is the mode for experienced copiers who want manual control.

BloFin’s three discrete modes give a copier one more sizing method than Bybit’s two. In practice, BloFin’s Fixed Amount and Fixed Ratio map closely to Bybit’s Advanced Copy Mode, while both platforms’ Smart Copy options behave the same way: automatic sizing with the lead’s leverage. The extra mode is a real edge for BloFin, but it is a modest one rather than a structural difference.

Per-order risk controls

Both platforms let copiers cap risk at the order level, and Bybit’s published controls are more granular.

On BloFin, each copy carries its own take-profit and stop-loss, a choice of cross or isolated margin, and the option to copy the lead’s leverage or set your own fixed leverage.

On Bybit, copiers can set a stop-loss ratio per order, a take-profit ratio per order, a maximum position margin per contract, a maximum daily position limit, and a customizable maximum slippage per order.

Bybit’s default slippage threshold varies from 0.5% to 1.5% by trading pair, and a copy order is skipped if the entry price moves beyond that threshold.

Bybit also offers Perp Copy Stop Loss, which unfollows a Master Trader once accumulated losses hit a set amount.

On the number of published risk parameters, Bybit is ahead, particularly with its customizable per-order slippage cap and daily position limit. BloFin covers the essentials that most copiers actually use: take-profit, stop-loss, margin mode, and leverage.

Trader analytics on the leaderboard

Picking a lead is the most important decision a copier makes, and the two platforms give you different information to make it.

Both leaderboards show the basics: ROI, win rate, total followers, and maximum drawdown.

BloFin’s leaderboard goes further, reporting risk-adjusted metrics next to those figures: the Sharpe ratio (return against total volatility), the Sortino ratio (return against downside volatility), and the Calmar ratio (return against maximum drawdown).

Bybit displays Sharpe and Sortino ratios as well, but does not surface a Calmar ratio.

In some cases, Bybit also reports Sharpe or Sortino values as ∞, which can make comparisons between traders less informative.

The difference matters when two traders post similar ROI. The one who earned it with steadier, lower-volatility trades should show a higher Sharpe and Sortino; the one who generated returns while taking deeper drawdowns should show a lower Calmar.

While Bybit users can assess volatility-adjusted performance through Sharpe and Sortino, they lack a direct measure of how efficiently returns were generated relative to maximum drawdown.

For a copier evaluating an unfamiliar lead, BloFin’s inclusion of the Calmar ratio provides an additional lens on risk-adjusted performance that is not readily available on Bybit.

Profit share to the lead

Copy trading layers a profit share to the lead trader on top of normal trading fees.

On BloFin, the standard profit share to the lead is 10%, currently up to 20% for eligible traders.

On Bybit, the share is tiered by the Master Trader’s rank on the platform, 10% at the entry tiers, rising to 15% for gold-ranked leads.

The ranges are close: Bybit’s ceiling is slightly lower, while BloFin’s standard rate matches Bybit’s entry tier at 10%.

Either way, the profit share is usually the larger cost component for a copier, ahead of per-trade fees.

Fees on the underlying trades

Copy trading does not waive normal trading fees. Every copied trade pays the same maker or taker fee as a direct trade, plus the profit share.

• BloFin futures taker (base, VIP 0): 0.0600%
• Bybit futures taker (base, VIP 0): 0.0550%

On the base futures taker rate, Bybit is cheaper by 0.0050%.

For a copier turning over 100,000 USDT in notional per month, that gap is roughly 5 USDT, small next to the profit share but real at high volume.

This is a clear, honest win for Bybit at the base tier.

Higher up the ladder, the picture shifts in both directions. BloFin’s VIP 1 is reached by holding 50,000 USDT in assets (the easiest of its three entry routes; the others are volume thresholds) and drops the futures rate to 0.05% taker and 0.006% maker.

Bybit’s first tier opens at a 100,000 USDT balance or a 30-day volume threshold and prices futures at 0.04% taker and 0.018% maker.

So at VIP 1, Bybit is cheaper on taker, and BloFin is cheaper on maker, and the real difference is the bar: BloFin’s asset threshold is half of Bybit’s.

For a copier with under 100,000 USDT to park, BloFin’s discount opens first; for one above it, Bybit’s VIP taker pricing takes the edge.

Trader roster, track record, and liquidity

Bybit has run consumer copy trading longer and operates one of the larger derivatives venues in crypto, which gives it three advantages here: a longer track record, a larger roster of Master Traders to filter on win rate, drawdown, and follower count, and deeper liquidity for execution.

For a copier shopping for a strategy rather than copying someone they already know, a larger roster means more filtering options.

BloFin’s roster is smaller and growing. Its up-to-20% profit share is partly a tool to attract strong lead traders.

For a copier who already knows which trader they want to follow, roster size is moot.

For one still searching, Bybit’s larger pool is the stronger starting point.

Spot copy trading

BloFin extended copy trading to spot markets alongside its futures product, which is uncommon among crypto-native venues that built copy trading on perpetuals first. Bybit’s copy trading covers USDT perpetuals only.

For a copier who wants long-only spot exposure without funding-rate risk, BloFin’s spot copy option is a genuine difference.

Most copy trading still runs on perpetuals because that is where leads publish their trades, but the spot route opens a different risk profile.

Proof of reserves and transparency

Both exchanges publish proof of reserves with Merkle-tree verification, which lets a user check that customer balances are backed one-to-one.

Industry trackers such as CoinGecko list overall venue volume and trust signals worth checking before committing capital, since copy-execution quality scales with how liquid the underlying venue is.

BloFin states a 1:1 reserve policy with ratios above 100%, customer assets held separately from corporate funds, and third-party on-chain tracking through Nansen.

Bybit publishes a monthly Merkle-tree proof of reserves that has been audited by Hacken since 2024, a program tested in practice when the venue absorbed a roughly $1.5 billion ETH theft in February 2025, replenished reserves, and kept withdrawals open. Both meet the current industry standard.

Which one fits which copier

Choose BloFin if you are:

• Wanting to vet a lead on risk-adjusted metrics (Sharpe, Sortino, Calmar), not just ROI and win rate
• Looking for one more position-sizing mode than Bybit offers
• Interested in spot copy trading alongside futures
• Able to hold 50,000 USDT in assets and want the accessible VIP 1 fee path
• Wanting a standard 10% profit share to the lead, with a published 20% ceiling for eligible leads

Choose Bybit if you are:

• Shopping a larger roster of Master Traders with a longer track record and deeper liquidity
• Already trading on Bybit and want to add copy trading without moving funds
• Optimizing for the lowest base futures taker fee at base tier
• Wanting the most granular per-order risk controls, including customizable slippage and a daily position limit

Beyond copy trading: the venue underneath

A copier picking between the two is also picking the venue. Three differences sit outside the copy product.

BloFin’s BTC and ETH perpetuals run to 150x leverage against Bybit’s 100x, a spec that matters less than it markets, since copy positions inherit the lead’s sizing anyway.

Both venues offer demo modes, though Bybit’s demo does not extend to copy trading.

Liquidity cuts the other way: Bybit’s derivatives book runs roughly an order of magnitude deeper by daily volume, which is the single biggest venue-level advantage for a copier following high-frequency leads.

Risks to weigh either way

Copy trading is not a guaranteed path to profit. Past leaderboard returns are not predictive, and copiers tend to underperform the lead they follow because their orders fill on a slight delay at slightly worse prices, a gap that compounds during volatility.

The Bitget copy trading guide explains copy trading as automatically mirroring another trader’s positions, and notes that the copier inherits the lead’s risk profile, not just the upside.

Before allocating on either platform, verify a lead’s full track record and drawdown depth rather than recent wins, diversify across traders if capital allows, and set stop-loss controls on every copy.

FAQ

What is the minimum to start copy trading on BloFin or Bybit?

Both require 100 USDT to copy a single trader, so they tie on the entry point. On Bybit, an individual Master Trader can set a higher required minimum than the 100 USDT floor.

Does BloFin or Bybit have more copy trading modes?

BloFin has three modes (Smart Copy, Fixed Amount, Fixed Ratio). Bybit has two (Smart Copy Mode and Advanced Copy Mode). Both platforms’ Smart Copy options size positions automatically and follow the lead’s leverage.

Which exchange has lower copy trading fees?

Bybit has a marginally lower base futures taker rate, 0.0550% versus BloFin’s 0.0600%. On top of trading fees, both charge a profit share to the lead, which is the larger cost for most copiers. BloFin’s profit share is standard 10% (up to 20%); Bybit’s is tiered by trader rank, 10% to 15%.

Can I copy multiple traders at once on both platforms?

Yes on both. Because each platform sets the same 100 USDT floor per trader, the capital needed to diversify across several leads is the same on BloFin and Bybit. Diversifying across, say, three traders takes at least 300 USDT on either one.

Does BloFin or Bybit offer spot copy trading?

BloFin supports both futures and spot copy trading natively. Bybit’s crypto copy trading covers USDT perpetuals only.

Which platform gives better data for vetting a lead trader?

BloFin’s leaderboard reports Sharpe, Sortino, and Calmar ratios alongside ROI, win rate, and maximum drawdown. Bybit also displays Sharpe and Sortino ratios, but does not provide a Calmar ratio. As a result, BloFin gives copiers one more risk-adjusted lens for distinguishing between traders with similar returns but different risk profiles.

Which platform gives copiers more per-order risk controls?

Bybit exposes more published parameters, including a stop-loss ratio per order, take-profit ratio per order, maximum position margin per contract, daily position limit, and a customizable maximum slippage per order (default 0.5% to 1.5%). BloFin covers take-profit, stop-loss, margin mode, and leverage per copy.

The short version

Both platforms start at the same 100 USDT to copy a trader, so the choice comes down to what happens after you fund the account. BloFin is the better fit for a copier who wants more ways to size each copy, risk-adjusted analytics (Sharpe, Sortino, Calmar) to vet a lead, native spot copy alongside futures, and an accessible VIP fee path. Bybit is the stronger choice for a copier who wants the longest track record, the largest roster to filter, the deepest liquidity, the lowest base futures fee, and the most granular per-order risk controls. The right pick depends on whether deeper controls and trader analytics matter more to you than roster size and base-tier pricing.

Information as of June 2026. Both exchanges update copy trading products frequently. Crypto trading carries risk of total loss. This article is editorial and is not investment advice. Confirm minimums, fee schedules, and feature availability on each exchange’s official help center before allocating capital. 

The post BloFin vs Bybit copy trading: head-to-head comparison appeared first on Invezz